Steele v. Niggelie

293 S.E.2d 368, 163 Ga. App. 98, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3187
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 2, 1982
Docket63787
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 293 S.E.2d 368 (Steele v. Niggelie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steele v. Niggelie, 293 S.E.2d 368, 163 Ga. App. 98, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Steele (husband) and Niggelie (wife) were divorced May 17, 1976. On April 6, 1977 the trial court on a motion made by Niggelie amended the divorce decree. In February 1981 Steele filed a separate action seeking to modify the decree, to have Niggelie held in contempt for failure to comply with visitation, and to set aside the April 6, 1977 order modifying the original decree. The trial court ruled in favor of Niggelie on all issues and Steele’s motion for new trial was denied. Steele filed a discretionary appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court enumerating as error the trial court’s denial of his petition for modification, contempt, and to set aside the April 6,1977 order and the denial of his motion for new trial. The discretionary appeal was denied. Steele now appeals to this court solely on the issue of the trial court’s refusal to set aside the trial court’s order of April 6, 1977; however, he did not file an application for discretionary appeal *99 to this court.

Decided July 2, 1982 Rehearing denied July 15, 1982. Carl K. Nelson, Jr., for appellant. Will Ed Smith, for appellee.

Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Pretermitting the fact that this court is of the opinion that a denial of a discretionary appeal under Code Ann. § 6-701.1 by the Supreme Court of Georgia invokes the doctrine of res judicata when the judgment appealed was final and on the merits, Byrd v. Byrd, 248 Ga. 163, 164 (281 SE2d 617) (1981), this appeal must be dismissed. “[I]n domestic relations cases, a failure to file an application to appeal will result in dismissal of the appeal. [Cits.]” Bedford v. Bedford, 246 Ga. 780 (273 SE2d 167) (1980). While an order may be procedurally subject to direct appeal, where the underlying subject matter is that of divorce, alimony, custody or contempt pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701.1, failure to comply with this code section will result in dismissal of the appeal. Id. The appeal of the denial of a motion to set aside arising out of a divorce case will be dismissed for failure to comply with Code Ann. § 6-701.1. Fields v. Fields, 247 Ga. 437, 438 (276 SE2d 614) (1981); cert. den. (- U. S. -, 102 SC 319, 70 LE2d 161) (1982)).

Appeal dismissed.

Deen, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saadiq A. Yarbrough v. Andrea D. Ware
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Henderson v. Justice
514 S.E.2d 713 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
In the Interest of C. D. B.
355 S.E.2d 759 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
McLemore v. Stephenson
354 S.E.2d 17 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 S.E.2d 368, 163 Ga. App. 98, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-niggelie-gactapp-1982.