Steele v. Motz

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2010·No. 10-1006·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1006

SCOTT STEELE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. FREDERICK MOTZ,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge, sitting by designation. (1:09-cv-00792-FPS)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Ann Kidwell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Scott Steele appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action against the district court judge who

presided over a prior action. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Steele v. Motz, No. 1:09-

cv-00792-FPS (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steele v. Motz, (4th Cir. 2010).

Steele v. Motz (Steele v. Motz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.