Steele v. Motz
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1006
SCOTT STEELE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. FREDERICK MOTZ,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge, sitting by designation. (1:09-cv-00792-FPS)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Ann Kidwell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Scott Steele appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action against the district court judge who
presided over a prior action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Steele v. Motz, No. 1:09-
cv-00792-FPS (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steele v. Motz (Steele v. Motz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.