Steele v. Matteson

15 N.W. 488, 50 Mich. 313, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 788
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 18, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 N.W. 488 (Steele v. Matteson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steele v. Matteson, 15 N.W. 488, 50 Mich. 313, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 788 (Mich. 1883).

Opinion

Graves, C. J.

The plaintiff sued in replevin for a quantity of saw-logs, and they were seized under the writ and delivered to him.

The trial was conducted without a jury, and the judge reserved a decision until the vacation and then sent to the clerk a summary of the proceedings, including his opinion and direction to enter judgment for the defendants. It does not appear that a special finding was demanded, and this paper did not cover such a finding. It was a mere informal statement containing some facts, together with items of evidence and offers of proof and rulings upon objections, followed by an opinion upon the result, with a direction to the clerk. This was .regarded by the clerk as a regular finding, and he made it the basis of a judgment, which he entered in vacation, but not as of the last day of the preceding term.

There was consequently no proper basis for the judgment, and at the same time it was irregular in not being entered as of the time prescribed by the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Goodman
167 N.W. 955 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)
Jandt v. Potthast
71 N.W. 216 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Whitney v. Hyde
51 N.W. 696 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 N.W. 488, 50 Mich. 313, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-matteson-mich-1883.