Steele v. Matteson

15 N.W. 488, 50 Mich. 313, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 788
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 1883·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Graves, C. J.

The plaintiff sued in replevin for a quantity of saw-logs, and they were seized under the writ and delivered to him.

The trial was conducted without a jury, and the judge reserved a decision until the vacation and then sent to the clerk a summary of the proceedings, including his opinion and direction to enter judgment for the defendants. It does not appear that a special finding was demanded, and this paper did not cover such a finding. It was a mere informal statement containing some facts, together with items of evidence and offers of proof and rulings upon objections, followed by an opinion upon the result, with a direction to the clerk. This was .regarded by the clerk as a regular finding, and he made it the basis of a judgment, which he entered in vacation, but not as of the last day of the preceding term.

There was consequently no proper basis for the judgment, and at the same time it was irregular in not being entered as of the time prescribed by the statute.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steele v. Matteson, 15 N.W. 488, 50 Mich. 313, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 788 (Mich. 1883).

15 N.W. 488 (Steele v. Matteson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Goodman
167 N.W. 955 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)
Jandt v. Potthast
71 N.W. 216 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Whitney v. Hyde
51 N.W. 696 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)