Steele v. Kinsey

840 So. 2d 1023, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 176, 2003 WL 297222
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 13, 2003·No. No. SC02-152·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Steele v. Kinsey, 801 So.2d 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), a decision of a district court of appeal certifying conflict with the decision of another district court of appeal. Upon reflection and further consideration, we now conclude that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ„ concur. LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steele v. Kinsey, 840 So. 2d 1023, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 176, 2003 WL 297222 (Fla. 2003).

840 So. 2d 1023 (Steele v. Kinsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Hampshire Indemnity Company v. John Gray Damil Belizaire etc.
177 So. 3d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Jones v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc.
908 So. 2d 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)