Steele v. . Holt
75 N.C. 188
This text of 75 N.C. 188 (Steele v. . Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Steele v. . Holt, 75 N.C. 188 (N.C. 1876).
Opinion
A contract void for illegality of consideration secured by a bond to pay money is not cured by the substitution of a new bond in place of the old one, for the same or for some other amount, between the same parties. *190 Noe does the adding of a mortgage as an additional security make any difference.
There is no error.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 N.C. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-holt-nc-1876.