Steele v. . Holt

75 N.C. 188
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1876·Published

Opinion

Reade, J.

A contract void for illegality of consideration secured by a bond to pay money is not cured by the substitution of a new bond in place of the old one, for the same or for some other amount, between the same parties. *190 Noe does the adding of a mortgage as an additional security make any difference.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steele v. . Holt, 75 N.C. 188 (N.C. 1876).

75 N.C. 188 (Steele v. . Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.