Steele v. City of Buffalo Department of Community Development

86 A.D.2d 754, 447 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15326
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 A.D.2d 754 (Steele v. City of Buffalo Department of Community Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steele v. City of Buffalo Department of Community Development, 86 A.D.2d 754, 447 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner was hired as assistant director of intervenor-appellant, Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc., a nonprofit agency having a contract with the City of Buffalo and funded by the city primarily through Federal Community Development Block grants. A term in the contract between the city and the agency requires that staff vacancies be filled with city residents. The contract makes provision, however, for a waiver of the residency requirement in the sole discretion of respondent commissioner. Petitioner appeals from a dismissal without prejudice and without an evidentiary hearing of his CPLR article 78 proceeding in which he asserts a claim of impermissible discriminatory enforcement of the contractual residency requirement. This appeal from a nonfinal order in a CPLR article 78 proceeding does not lie as of right; nor has permission to appeal been sought or granted. We therefore dismiss the appeal (see CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 1; Matter of Wallace v Wyandanch Union Free School Dist., 58 AD2d 813; Cirasole v Simins, 48 AD2d 795; Hawley v Town of Aurora, 41 AD2d 588). Had we reached the merits of this appeal we would have affirmed Special Term’s dismissal without prejudice; petitioner has not presented sworn affidavits or other proof supplying factual detail showing that he is more likely than not to succeed on the merits (see Matter of 303 West 42nd St. Corp. v Klein, 46 NY2d 686, 695-696). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — art 78.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Manilla
133 A.D.2d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Driscoll v. Department of Fire
112 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A.D.2d 754, 447 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-city-of-buffalo-department-of-community-development-nyappdiv-1982.