Steele v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
19 A.D.2d 937, 245 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2894
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The papers on the application for summary judgment demonstrate the existence of triable issues, requiring proof of such things as the intent of the parties to the contract and the attendant circumstances. Judgment and order reversed, on the law and the facts, and motions for summary judgment denied, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steele v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp., 19 A.D.2d 937, 245 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).
19 A.D.2d 937 (Steele v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Katherine O'rourke, Claimant-Appellee, and Amelia O'rourke, Claimant-Appellant v. Merry Queen Transfer Corp., Petitioner-Appellee-Appellant
370 F.2d 781 (Second Circuit, 1967)