Steele v. Calhoun

61 Miss. 556
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 61 Miss. 556 (Steele v. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steele v. Calhoun, 61 Miss. 556 (Mich. 1884).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Dogwood Flat Church was the voting place for the election precinct in which it was situated, and had been for years without any formal designation by competent authority, but by the action of those participating in the several elections held there. Several months before the election of 1883 the house was removed to a point three-quarters of a mile from its former site and erected there by general consent of the neighborhood, and it was still called by its former name and was used as it had been before, for public assemblies and holding justices’ courts. The election of November, 1883, was held in Dogwood Flat Church at its new site, and it does not appear that any elector was at any loss to ascertain where the election for that election district was being held or was prevented from voting because of a change of the place at which the polls were opened.

The election was properly held at Dogwood Flat Church.

The marked ballots were properly rejected. The rule established by § 137 of the Code of 1880 excludes “any device or mark by which one ticket may be known or distinguished from another,” and we are not permitted to distinguish between the different devices or marks which may be, put on ballots. “Any device or mark, etc.,” is prohibited and sufficient to condemn the ballot on which it is found.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregory v. Sanders
15 So. 2d 432 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
Carabajal v. Sandoval
22 N.M. 30 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1916)
People ex rel. Agnew v. Graham
267 Ill. 426 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1915)
Fuerst v. Semmler
149 N.W. 115 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
People ex rel. Agnew v. Graham
187 Ill. App. 599 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
Cross v. Keathley
119 Tenn. 567 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1907)
May v. State
63 S.W. 132 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1901)
People v. Brown
60 N.E. 46 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)
Hankey v. Bowman
84 N.W. 1002 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1901)
State ex rel. Law v. Saxon
30 Fla. 668 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)
Kellogg v. Hickman
12 Colo. 256 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)
Stemper v. Higgins
37 N.W. 95 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1888)
State ex rel. Smith v. Burbridge
24 Fla. 112 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Miss. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-calhoun-miss-1884.