Steele v. Boyd

113 S.E. 477, 121 S.C. 141, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 181
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 1, 1922
Docket11004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 477 (Steele v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steele v. Boyd, 113 S.E. 477, 121 S.C. 141, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 181 (S.C. 1922).

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Gary.

This is an action brought against the defendant for the unlawful possession, use, and occupation of certain concrete mixers belonging to the plaintiff, and for damages to the same, together with expenses incurred in repairs thereof, and time necessarily lost by plaintiff and his laborers. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the *143 sum of $255, and the defendant appealed upon exceptions which will be reported.

If his Honor, the presiding Judge, stated the issues raised by the pleadings erroneously, it was the duty of counsel to call his attention to such error.

Appeal dismissed.

Mr. Justices Fraser and Marion concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.
177 S.E. 29 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 477, 121 S.C. 141, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-boyd-sc-1922.