Steel v. Roach

1 S.C.L. 63
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas·Decided June 2, 1788·Published

Opinion

The Court,

after full argument, discharged the rule, upon the ground of this being a qui tam or penal action, in which case the court will seldom grant a new trial, as these kind of penal actions are considered as hard and rigorous ones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steel v. Roach, 1 S.C.L. 63 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1788).

1 S.C.L. 63 (Steel v. Roach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.