Steel v. Roach
1 S.C.L. 63
Opinion
after full argument, discharged the rule, upon the ground of this being a qui tam or penal action, in which case the court will seldom grant a new trial, as these kind of penal actions are considered as hard and rigorous ones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steel v. Roach, 1 S.C.L. 63 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1788).
1 S.C.L. 63 (Steel v. Roach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.