Steel v. Payne
42 Ga. 207
Opinion
There was such a part performance of the contract on the part of the plaintiff, on the statement of facts contained in [209]*209the record as would take the case out of the provisions of the 5th paragraph of the 1940th section of the Code, and it was error in the Court below to dismiss the plaintiff’s action.
Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steel v. Payne, 42 Ga. 207 (Ga. 1871).
42 Ga. 207 (Steel v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tanner v. Campbell
184 S.E. 705 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Richards v. Plaza Hotel Inc.
156 S.E. 809 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)