Steel-Drake Baking Co. v. H. C. & A. I. Piercy Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steel-Drake Baking Co. v. H. C. & A. I. Piercy Contracting Co.

140 A.D. 113, 124 N.Y.S. 1107, 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2872

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Woodward, J.:

The plaintiff has a judgment, entered on the verdict of a jury in the Municipal Court, for $327 damages sustained by its horse in a collision with a wagon of defendant, at the junction of Water and Roosevelt streets, borough of Manhattan, on January 13, 1909. It is not seriously contended on this appeal that the defendant was not guilty of negligence in driving a heavily-loaded truck down a steep grade at a trot approaching this busy street intersection, but it is urged that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law, in that its driver could or should have seen the approaching vehicle in time to have avoided the accident by stopping. We are of opinion that the evidence was sufficient to permit the case to go to the jury upon this point, and that we are not called upon to interfere. Plaintiff’s driver testified that he was prevented from seeing the approaching team until it was quite near him, owing to an obstruction; that when he did see the team [114] approaching at a rapid rate he stoppéd as quickly as he could; that liis horse was hard bitted and did not stop promptly. He was driving upon a walk, following another vehicle; and while it may seem probable that he might have stopped- his' horse soon enough to have avoided the collision, it is to be remembered that the jury heard all of the testimony ; that they are familiar with the location, and that the plaintiff’s driver had a right to drive liis rig on the assumption that every other driver, in approaching a busy street intersection, would observe due care.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Woodward, Jenks, Thomas, Bioh and Carr, JJ.

Judgment and order of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodward, J.:

The plaintiff has a judgment, entered on the verdict of a jury in the Municipal Court, for $327 damages sustained by its horse in a collision with a wagon of defendant, at the junction of Water and Roosevelt streets, borough of Manhattan, on January 13, 1909. It is not seriously contended on this appeal that the defendant was not guilty of negligence in driving a heavily-loaded truck down a steep grade at a trot approaching this busy street intersection, but it is urged that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law, in that its driver could or should have seen the approaching vehicle in time to have avoided the accident by stopping. We are of opinion that the evidence was sufficient to permit the case to go to the jury upon this point, and that we are not called upon to interfere. Plaintiff’s driver testified that he was prevented from seeing the approaching team until it was quite near him, owing to an obstruction; that when he did see the team [114] approaching at a rapid rate he stoppéd as quickly as he could; that liis horse was hard bitted and did not stop promptly. He was driving upon a walk, following another vehicle; and while it may seem probable that he might have stopped- his' horse soon enough to have avoided the collision, it is to be remembered that the jury heard all of the testimony ; that they are familiar with the location, and that the plaintiff’s driver had a right to drive liis rig on the assumption that every other driver, in approaching a busy street intersection, would observe due care.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Woodward, Jenks, Thomas, Bioh and Carr, JJ.

Judgment and order of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Steel-Drake Baking Co. v. H. C. & A. I. Piercy Contracting Co., 140 A.D. 113, 124 N.Y.S. 1107, 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

140 A.D. 113 (Steel-Drake Baking Co. v. H. C. & A. I. Piercy Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related