Steed v. State

286 S.W. 222, 104 Tex. Crim. 579, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 23, 1926
DocketNo. 10295.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 286 S.W. 222 (Steed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steed v. State, 286 S.W. 222, 104 Tex. Crim. 579, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925 (Tex. 1926).

Opinion

*580 MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is forgery, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. There are four bills of exceptions. In one complaint is made of the failure to instruct the jury that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. The others relate to the introduction of the evidence.

In the absence of a statement of facts the sufficiency of the evidence must be presumed. Nothing appears in the bills of exceptions which enables us to determine, in the absence of the facts, that error was committed in any of the rulings of which complaint is made.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. State
61 S.W.2d 832 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Oliver v. State
60 S.W.2d 234 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Colbert v. State
43 S.W.2d 1099 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 S.W. 222, 104 Tex. Crim. 579, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steed-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.