Stedman v. Underhill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stedman v. Underhill

234 A.D. 884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 884 (Stedman v. Underhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stedman v. Underhill, 234 A.D. 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order in so far as it denies motion to strike out certain defenses and a counterclaim reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of striking out the first [885]*885defense and counterclaim. In all other respects the order is affirmed, without costs. The first defense and counterclaim are insufficient in law. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order in so far as it denies motion to strike out certain defenses and a counterclaim reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of striking out the first [885]*885defense and counterclaim. In all other respects the order is affirmed, without costs. The first defense and counterclaim are insufficient in law. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stedman-v-underhill-nyappdiv-1931.