Stedman, District Attorney v. Duncan, MDJ
This text of Stedman, District Attorney v. Duncan, MDJ (Stedman, District Attorney v. Duncan, MDJ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 142 MM 2016 EX REL. CRAIG W. STEDMAN, : DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LANCASTER : COUNTY, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JAYNE F. DUNCAN, MAGISTERIAL : DISTRICT JUDGE, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stedman, District Attorney v. Duncan, MDJ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stedman-district-attorney-v-duncan-mdj-pa-2017.