Stedenfeld v. Stedenfeld

114 A. 406, 92 N.J. Eq. 241, 7 Stock. 241, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 323
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance—The Chibe-Justice, SwayiZE, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Ivatzenbaci-i, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stedenfeld v. Stedenfeld, 114 A. 406, 92 N.J. Eq. 241, 7 Stock. 241, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 323 (N.J. 1920).

114 A. 406 (Stedenfeld v. Stedenfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shackleford v. Dobbs
61 So. 2d 669 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Renner v. German
207 S.W.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1947)