Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Stedenfeld v. Stedenfeld

Stedenfeld v. Stedenfeld

114 A. 406, 92 N.J. Eq. 241, 7 Stock. 241, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 323
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 21, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 A. 406 (Stedenfeld v. Stedenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stedenfeld v. Stedenfeld, 114 A. 406, 92 N.J. Eq. 241, 7 Stock. 241, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 323 (N.J. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance—The Chibe-Justice, SwayiZE, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Ivatzenbaci-i, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shackleford v. Dobbs
61 So. 2d 669 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Renner v. German
207 S.W.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A. 406, 92 N.J. Eq. 241, 7 Stock. 241, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stedenfeld-v-stedenfeld-nj-1920.