Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v. Chumpitaz

5 A.D.3d 663, 774 N.Y.S.2d 718, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 5 A.D.3d 663 (Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v. Chumpitaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v. Chumpitaz, 5 A.D.3d 663, 774 N.Y.S.2d 718, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In an action for ejectment, the defendant appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hubsher, J.), dated April 8, 2003, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, and (2) an amended order of the same court dated April 10, 2003, as granted the plaintiffs same motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated April 8, 2003, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the amended order dated April 10, 2003; and it is further,

Ordered that the amended order dated April 10, 2003, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, so much of the order dated April 8, 2003, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is vacated, and the motion is denied.

The plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment, as the papers submitted in support of its motion failed to include copies of the pleadings in the action (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Capelin Assoc. v Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 NY2d 338 [1974]; Lawlor v County of Nassau, 166 AD2d 692 [1990]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are academic in light of our determination or without merit. Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mieles v. Tarar
100 A.D.3d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Ahern v. Shepherd
89 A.D.3d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Fiber Consultants, Inc. v. Fiber Optek Interconnect Corp.
84 A.D.3d 1153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Liberty Doorworks, Inc. v. Baranello
83 A.D.3d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Board of Assessors
73 A.D.3d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Fishkin v. Feinstein
67 A.D.3d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Sendor v. Chervin
51 A.D.3d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Roach v. AVR Realty Co.
41 A.D.3d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Thompson v. Foreign Cars Center, Inc.
40 A.D.3d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Matsyuk v. Konkalipos
35 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Barca v. City of New York
13 Misc. 3d 464 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Wider v. Heller
24 A.D.3d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 663, 774 N.Y.S.2d 718, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sted-tenants-owners-corp-v-chumpitaz-nyappdiv-2004.