Steckmeyer v. Whalen

269 A.D.2d 855, 703 N.Y.S.2d 802, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1812
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court granted plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction, adjourning for 30 days an initial hearing concerning professional misconduct charges against plaintiff on the ground that plaintiff had insufficient time to prepare his defense to the charges. We granted defendants’ motion for a stay of that order, thereby permitting the administrative hearing to proceed. Defendants’ appeal is therefore moot, and defendants have failed to show that this [856] case falls within an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713-715). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.— Injunction.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Hayes, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steckmeyer v. Whalen, 269 A.D.2d 855, 703 N.Y.S.2d 802, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 855 (Steckmeyer v. Whalen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interface Solutions, Inc. v. Donoghue
37 A.D.3d 1127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)