Stecker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stecker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

589 So. 2d 343, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10980, 1991 WL 225587

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 6, 1991

DocketNo. 91-0689

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 589 So. 2d 343 (Stecker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stecker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 589 So. 2d 343, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10980, 1991 WL 225587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s decision to submit the question of permanent injury to the jury and to sustain the jury's decision, as well as the trial court’s subsequent refusal to grant a new trial. In particular, we agree with appellee that the testimony of its examining physician was sufficient to create an issue of fact as to permanent injury. In addition, the jury had before it other evidence which could have, depending upon the jury’s evaluation thereof, supported the verdict of the jury and the decisions of the trial court.

ANSTEAD, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s decision to submit the question of permanent injury to the jury and to sustain the jury's decision, as well as the trial court’s subsequent refusal to grant a new trial. In particular, we agree with appellee that the testimony of its examining physician was sufficient to create an issue of fact as to permanent injury. In addition, the jury had before it other evidence which could have, depending upon the jury’s evaluation thereof, supported the verdict of the jury and the decisions of the trial court.

ANSTEAD, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 So. 2d 343, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10980, 1991 WL 225587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stecker-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack