Steck v. Watkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Steck v. Watkins

440 S.W.3d 516, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 630, 2014 WL 2518477

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 3, 2014·No. No. WD 75898·Published

Opinion

[517] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Steve Watkins appeals from a judgment entered against him in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, finding him 50% at fault in a negligence action filed against him by Carla Steck. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[517] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Steve Watkins appeals from a judgment entered against him in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, finding him 50% at fault in a negligence action filed against him by Carla Steck. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Steck v. Watkins, 440 S.W.3d 516, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 630, 2014 WL 2518477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

440 S.W.3d 516 (Steck v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.