Steck v. Bondtight Roofing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Steck v. Bondtight Roofing Co.

832 S.W.2d 27, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 1992 WL 144949

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1992·No. No. 61218·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimants appeal from a final award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, denying workers’ compensation [28]*28death benefits to claimants. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by the evidence, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimants appeal from a final award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, denying workers’ compensation [28]*28death benefits to claimants. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by the evidence, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Steck v. Bondtight Roofing Co., 832 S.W.2d 27, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 1992 WL 144949 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

832 S.W.2d 27 (Steck v. Bondtight Roofing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.