Steck v. Board of Education of Camden
11 A.2d 260, 124 N.J.L. 132, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steck v. Board of Education of Camden. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 N.J.L. 261 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmanc e—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steck v. Board of Education of Camden, 11 A.2d 260, 124 N.J.L. 132, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 261 (N.J. 1940).
11 A.2d 260 (Steck v. Board of Education of Camden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.