Stebe v. Guru Unlimited, LLC

413 S.W.3d 20, 2013 WL 5744510, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1241
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. ED 99568·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Guru Unlimited, LLC (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Robert Stebe and Deborah Salivar-Keene (“Respondents”) [21] denying Appellant’s motion to set aside a default judgment entered against it. Appellant argues the trial court abused its discretion in denying its motion because the motion satisfied the pleading requirements of Rule 74.05.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stebe v. Guru Unlimited, LLC, 413 S.W.3d 20, 2013 WL 5744510, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1241 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

413 S.W.3d 20 (Stebe v. Guru Unlimited, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.