Stebbins v. Sherwood
241 A.D. 615, 269 N.Y.S. 916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Upon the rehearing it may be determined whether the defendant was possessed of a weapon at the time of the commission of the crime charged, and if so, was such possession lawful. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ. [148 Misc. 763.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stebbins v. Sherwood, 241 A.D. 615, 269 N.Y.S. 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
241 A.D. 615 (Stebbins v. Sherwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cosgrove v. Kubiniec
56 A.D.2d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Rosenblatt v. Pantaline
60 Misc. 2d 823 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Hogan v. Ascione
31 A.D.2d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
People v. Evans
18 A.D.2d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
People ex rel. Hunt v. McDonnell
201 Misc. 406 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Bennett v. Merritt
173 Misc. 355 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)