Stebbins v. Frigidaire Corp.

Sixth Circuit

Stebbins v. Frigidaire Corp.

85 F.2d 915, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 7, 1936

DocketNo. 7515

StatusPublished

This text of 85 F.2d 915 (Stebbins v. Frigidaire Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stebbins v. Frigidaire Corp., 85 F.2d 915, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that the motion to docket and dismiss the appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that the appellant has failed to file the record or docket the case on or before the return day and that there has been no extension of time therefor, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that the motion to docket and dismiss the appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that the appellant has failed to file the record or docket the case on or before the return day and that there has been no extension of time therefor, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F.2d 915, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stebbins-v-frigidaire-corp-ca6-1936.