Stebbens v. Lenfesty
This text of 14 Ind. 4 (Stebbens v. Lenfesty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit on note.
.Answer, first, denial; second, that defendant did not execute and deliver said note, &c.; third, want of consideration, setting out facts, &c.; fourth, failure of consideration, setting, out the facts relied on, &c.
Reply, in effect, denying the. third paragraph of the an-' swer. No notice taken of any other.
Trial, verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Motions for a new trial and in arrest overruled.
The only evidence given was the note.'
This judgment must be reversed. The fourth paragraph of the answer, as presented by the record, appears to stand uncontradicted. The facts averred in it, therefore, under the statute, were admitted, namely, that the consideration for which said note had been given had failed.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Ind. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stebbens-v-lenfesty-ind-1859.