Stebbens v. Lenfesty

14 Ind. 4
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 1859
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ind. 4 (Stebbens v. Lenfesty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stebbens v. Lenfesty, 14 Ind. 4 (Ind. 1859).

Opinion

Hanna, J.

Suit on note.

.Answer, first, denial; second, that defendant did not execute and deliver said note, &c.; third, want of consideration, setting out facts, &c.; fourth, failure of consideration, setting, out the facts relied on, &c.

Reply, in effect, denying the. third paragraph of the an-' swer. No notice taken of any other.

Trial, verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Motions for a new trial and in arrest overruled.

The only evidence given was the note.'

This judgment must be reversed. The fourth paragraph of the answer, as presented by the record, appears to stand uncontradicted. The facts averred in it, therefore, under the statute, were admitted, namely, that the consideration for which said note had been given had failed.

A. Steele, TI. D. Thompson, and M. L. Marsh, for the appellant. J. Broiunlee, for the appellee.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Ind. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stebbens-v-lenfesty-ind-1859.