Stebbens v. Cubberly

10 Ind. 301
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 31, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ind. 301 (Stebbens v. Cubberly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stebbens v. Cubberly, 10 Ind. 301 (Ind. 1858).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Cubberly filed, in the Grant Common Pleas, his complaint, in three paragraphs, on two promissory notes and an account. The notes, and a bill of particulars, were filed with the complaint. The notes^and account were against one Stebbens. He affidavit that the notes and account wers that he confessed judgment on them no^ creditors, &c.

The Court rendered the judgment.-

Stebbens then appealed to this Court, alj error, that the notes are not set out in the refers to § 384, 2 R. S. p. 124.

We think that section applies only to cases where no complaint, containing a copy of the cause of action, or accompanied by the cause, is filed. In such case, the judgment, to bar another action for the same cause, should contain the statement provided for in that section. Here, the complaint supplies it.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ind. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stebbens-v-cubberly-ind-1858.