Stearns v. Wallace

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Stearns v. Wallace

59 N.H. 595

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1879

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 N.H. 595 (Stearns v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stearns v. Wallace, 59 N.H. 595 (N.H. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

There is nothing in the case to take it out of the general rule that an infant is responsible for his torts. Fitts v. Hall, 9 N. H. 441; School District v. Bragdon, 23 N. H. 507, 516; Beckley v. Newcomb, 24 N. H. 359; Woodman v. Hubbard, 25 N. H. 67, 73; Prescott v. Norris, 32 N. H. 101; Eaton v. Hill, 50 N. H. 235; Cooley Torts 103.

Exception overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

There is nothing in the case to take it out of the general rule that an infant is responsible for his torts. Fitts v. Hall, 9 N. H. 441; School District v. Bragdon, 23 N. H. 507, 516; Beckley v. Newcomb, 24 N. H. 359; Woodman v. Hubbard, 25 N. H. 67, 73; Prescott v. Norris, 32 N. H. 101; Eaton v. Hill, 50 N. H. 235; Cooley Torts 103.

Exception overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.H. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stearns-v-wallace-nh-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack