Stearns v. Wallace
59 N.H. 595
Opinion
There is nothing in the case to take it out of the general rule that an infant is responsible for his torts. Fitts v. Hall, 9 N. H. 441; School District v. Bragdon, 23 N. H. 507, 516; Beckley v. Newcomb, 24 N. H. 359; Woodman v. Hubbard, 25 N. H. 67, 73; Prescott v. Norris, 32 N. H. 101; Eaton v. Hill, 50 N. H. 235; Cooley Torts 103.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stearns v. Wallace, 59 N.H. 595 (N.H. 1879).
59 N.H. 595 (Stearns v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Bailey
23 A.2d 363 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1941)