Stearns v. Wallace

58 N.H. 228
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1877
StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.H. 228 (Stearns v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stearns v. Wallace, 58 N.H. 228 (N.H. 1877).

Opinion

Smith, J.

The statute authorized the suit to be brought against the ward “ by his guardian,” that is, by process served on his guardian. Gen. St., c. 165, s. 4. If the writ should have commanded the sheriff *229 to summon the ward by serving the writ on the guardian, the departure from that form is not a defect of substance, and is not a ground of demurrer. Berry v. Osborn, 28 N. H. 279, 289. The proposed amendment, making both guardian and ward parties, was unnecessary and irregular, and should not have been allowed. The statutory requirement of notice by service of process was substantially complied with. Summoning the guardian “ in her said capacity,” was equivalent to summoning the ward by a summons served on the guardian.

Case discharged.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.H. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stearns-v-wallace-nh-1877.