Stearns v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 360, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 232
United States Customs Court·Decided February 14, 1951·No. No. 55240; protest 140782-K (Detroit)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The undisputed facts in this case established that the beef liver extract, described on the invoice as “Hidago Concentrado 1:20 en Polvo,” is properly dutiable as alleged by plaintiff. In accordance with stipulation of counsel, received in evidence as exhibit 2, that the remainder of the merchandise in question is substantially the same as that passed upon in Roche-Organon v. United States (35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was also sustained as to said items.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stearns v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 360, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 232 (cusc 1951).

26 Cust. Ct. 360 (Stearns v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.