Stearns v. Stearns

10 Vt. 540
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 15, 1838·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The attorneys of the creditors cannot, as such, appear. But they, or any member of the bar, may, as amici curia, suggest to the court that the petition is collusive, and direct the attention of the court, to such parts of the testimony as may show collusion, or, as may be insufficient to sustain the petition. But the court will not direct the clerk or the counsel for the petitioner, to submit the affidavits or other testimony relied upon, in support of the petition, to the inspection of such amici curia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stearns v. Stearns, 10 Vt. 540 (Vt. 1838).

10 Vt. 540 (Stearns v. Stearns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barrup v. Barrup
2014 VT 116 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2014)
Burke v. Burke
26 N.Y.S. 57 (Superior Court of New York, 1893)
Hemenway v. Hemenway
65 Vt. 623 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1893)