Stearns v. Love Drilling Co.
This text of 7 La. App. 493 (Stearns v. Love Drilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action the plaintiff, Lucinda Stearns, seeks to recover compensation under the State Employers’ Liability statute (Act No. 20 of 1914) for the death of her son.
She alleged that her son, while employed by defendant, which was operating a line of barges on the Ouachita' river, was knocked from one of the barges by being struck with material which was being loaded thereon, and drowned; and defendant filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court ratione materiae, which was sustained, and (plaintiff appeals.
The Ouachita river is admittedly a navigable stream, and under the plaintiff’s allegations the barges were operated in maritime service, and the employment of defendant was subject to the admiralty jurisdiction; (Volume 1, Corpus Juris, 1263, [494]*4941264, 1275; Meyer vs. Hankins Brothers, 5 La. App. 190); and the State Employers’ Liability statute is not applicable where an accident occurs to such an employee while engaged in maritime service (Knickerbocker Ice Co. vs. Stewart, 253 U. S. 149; 64 L. Ed. 834; Jones vs. Crescent City Ice Co., 162 La. 151, 110 South. 182. See notes, A. L. R. vol. 11, page 1155; vol. 31, page 518).
The action being instituted under the state statute, we think that the plea to the jurisdiction ratione materiae was properly sustained, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 La. App. 493, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stearns-v-love-drilling-co-lactapp-1927.