Stearns v. Hibben Dry Goods Co.
This text of 11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553 (Stearns v. Hibben Dry Goods Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The ruling -of the Superior Court in General Term upon a demurrer should, when the case is transferred to this court, be followed unless clearly erroneous.
The petition discloses no misrepresentation by the board of directors upon which the pl-aintiff relied to his prejudice, nor the concealment by them of any fact not recorded in the minutes, which, -on demand, were open to inspection by the plaintiff as a stockholder. - '
Whatever be the nature of the trust created by the resolution of the board of directors -on January 10th, 1898, it terminated on or before June 30th, 1899, more than six years before the commencement of the action.
Although a demand was necessary before beginning the action, the failure to make demand did not suspend the operation of the statute of limitations. Hawk v. Minnick, 19 O. S., 462; Douglass v. Corry, 46 O. S., 349; Townsend v. Eichelberger, 51 O. S., 213.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stearns-v-hibben-dry-goods-co-ohcircthamilton-1908.