Stearns v. Corry

83 So. 303, 78 Fla. 406
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 10, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term thereof upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and' the record having-been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the promises, i± seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged' by'the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., Taylor,; Whitfield and West, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., being disqualified, did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stearns v. Corry, 83 So. 303, 78 Fla. 406 (Fla. 1919).

83 So. 303 (Stearns v. Corry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.