Stearns v. City of Titusville

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stearns v. City of Titusville

246 So. 2d 641, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6837

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 1971

DocketNo. 70-737

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 246 So. 2d 641 (Stearns v. City of Titusville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stearns v. City of Titusville, 246 So. 2d 641, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6837 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff, Kenneth Stearns, appeals an order dismissing with prejudice an amended complaint against appellee-de-fendants, City of Titusville, et al. We affirm.

The record on appeal contains only the amended complaint. It is devoid of [642]*642any factual allegations, stating only that the allegations of the original complaint (not included in the record) are re-alleged, changing a date and striking the words “fraudulently” and “fraudulent” in several places. Thus, no indication of what the original cause of action was appears from the record.

It is the responsibility and duty of an appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned as error. Johnson v. Town of Eatonville, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 664. The appellant in the instant case has not favored this court with a sufficient record to review the matter assigned as error.

Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI