Steamboat Time v. Parmlee

Supreme Court of Missouri

Steamboat Time v. Parmlee

10 Mo. 586

DecidedMarch 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Mo. 586 (Steamboat Time v. Parmlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steamboat Time v. Parmlee, 10 Mo. 586 (Mo. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Scott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a proceeding under the statute concerning boats and vessels,, against the steamboat Time, the appellant. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

[587]*587The suit was to recover supplies furnished the boat, at Louisville in Kentucky. The owners of the boat did not reside in this State, and she was built at Louisville. This case then comes within the principle of that of the steamboat Raritan vs. Pollard, decided at this term of the Court, and raises the same question.

The other Judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a proceeding under the statute concerning boats and vessels,, against the steamboat Time, the appellant. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

[587]*587The suit was to recover supplies furnished the boat, at Louisville in Kentucky. The owners of the boat did not reside in this State, and she was built at Louisville. This case then comes within the principle of that of the steamboat Raritan vs. Pollard, decided at this term of the Court, and raises the same question.

The other Judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Mo. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steamboat-time-v-parmlee-mo-1847.