Steam-Gauge & Lantern Co. v. Rogers

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Steam-Gauge & Lantern Co. v. Rogers

31 F. 291, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2602

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

DecidedApril 15, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 31 F. 291 (Steam-Gauge & Lantern Co. v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steam-Gauge & Lantern Co. v. Rogers, 31 F. 291, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2602 (circtdma 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Nelson, J.

And now, at the suggestion of the parties, who appear by their respective attorneys, E. S. Jenney for complainants, and George H. Knight for defendants, it is ordered that the opinion of the court on file in this case (29 Fed. Rep. 453) be corrected by striking out the words “bent partly round,” in the last paragraph, and inserting in place thereof the words “passed through loops on,” so that the first two clauses thereof shall read as follows:

“ The defendants’ lantern differs from the plaintiffs’ only- in the following particulars: In the former the side wires are hooked into the lower perforated plate, instead of being wound round or under it; and, in place of guid«s, they are supported laterally, by being passed through loops on the side tubes.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson, J.

And now, at the suggestion of the parties, who appear by their respective attorneys, E. S. Jenney for complainants, and George H. Knight for defendants, it is ordered that the opinion of the court on file in this case (29 Fed. Rep. 453) be corrected by striking out the words “bent partly round,” in the last paragraph, and inserting in place thereof the words “passed through loops on,” so that the first two clauses thereof shall read as follows:

“ The defendants’ lantern differs from the plaintiffs’ only- in the following particulars: In the former the side wires are hooked into the lower perforated plate, instead of being wound round or under it; and, in place of guid«s, they are supported laterally, by being passed through loops on the side tubes.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 F. 291, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steam-gauge-lantern-co-v-rogers-circtdma-1887.