Steadman v. Steadman
14 A. 406, 10 Sadler 539
Opinion
Tbe disposition of this case in tbe court below was so obviously just and proper that an extended discussion of the assignments of error would be to no purpose. It is, therefore, enough for us to say that none of them can be sustained.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steadman v. Steadman, 14 A. 406, 10 Sadler 539 (Pa. 1888).
14 A. 406 (Steadman v. Steadman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Raynolds
27 A.2d 226 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Crane v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n
110 P.2d 81 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Craig v. Westerhoff
219 N.W. 4 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1928)
Rounds v. Coleman
214 S.W. 496 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
In re Maguire
105 Misc. 433 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1918)
Phillips' Estate
90 A. 457 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)