Steadman v. State

131 S.W. 679, 96 Ark. 344, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 40
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 31, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 S.W. 679 (Steadman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steadman v. State, 131 S.W. 679, 96 Ark. 344, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 40 (Ark. 1910).

Opinion

Wood, J.

The question presented by this petition is whether a judgment rendered in favor of a plaintiff whose death, according to the evidence in the bill of exceptions, occurred before the trial, can be reversed and set aside on certiorari.

Certiorari will not lie to correct errors or irregularities that could have been corrected on appeal. Reese v. Cannon, 73 Ark. 606; Salem v. Colley, 70 Ark. 71; Grinstead v. Wilson, 69 Ark. 587; Pine Bluff, etc., Co. v. Pine Bluff, 62 Ark. 196; Sumerow v. Johnson, 56 Ark. 85; Pettigrew v. Washington County, 43 Ark. 33; Haynes v. Semmes, 39 Ark. 399; Baskins v. Wylds, 39 Ark. 347; Payne v. McCabe, 37 Ark. 318.

The error complained of here was an irregularity that did not appear on the face of the record itself, but' was made to appear from the testimony in the case preserved in the bill of exceptions. The error was such as could have been corrected on appeal. There is no showing that the petitioner herein has unavoidably lost 'his right of appeal. _ -

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. Light
314 S.W.2d 479 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.W. 679, 96 Ark. 344, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steadman-v-state-ark-1910.