Steadman v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steadman v. Selsky

7 A.D.3d 721, 776 N.Y.S.2d 839

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.3d 721 (Steadman v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steadman v. Selsky, 7 A.D.3d 721, 776 N.Y.S.2d 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated July 29, 2002, which confirmed a determination of a hearing officer, dated June 11, 2002, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding that the petitioner violated three sections of the standards of inmate behavior and imposing penalties.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, he was not denied adequate employee assistance (see Matter of Greene v Coombe, 242 AD2d 796, 797 [1997]; Matter of Clavijo v Coombe, 236 AD2d 692 [1997]).

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the challenged determination (see Matter of Kalish v Keane, 256 AD2d 343, 344 [1998]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI