Steadman v. Jaeger

258 P. 1082, 44 Idaho 582, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 147

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided July 28, 1927·No. No. 4774.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This ease is controlled in principle' by the decision just announced in Arbie M. Dale v. W. E. Jaeger, ante, p. 576, 258 Pac. 1081.

Judgment reversed, with instruction to the trial court to dismiss the action. Costs to appellant.

Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Budge and Givens, JJ., concur. Taylor, J., took no part.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This ease is controlled in principle' by the decision just announced in Arbie M. Dale v. W. E. Jaeger, ante, p. 576, 258 Pac. 1081.

Judgment reversed, with instruction to the trial court to dismiss the action. Costs to appellant.

Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Budge and Givens, JJ., concur. Taylor, J., took no part.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Steadman v. Jaeger, 258 P. 1082, 44 Idaho 582, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 147 (Idaho 1927).

Pincite

258 P. 1082 (Steadman v. Jaeger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.