Steadman v. Crystal Gateway Marriott
This text of 63 F. App'x 152 (Steadman v. Crystal Gateway Marriott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
James Steadman appeals the district court’s order granting Crystal Gateway Marriott’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Steadman’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Steadman v. Crystal Gateway Marriott, No. CA-02-1230-A (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2002; entered Nov. 20, 2002). We deny Steadman’s motion titled “motion for rehearing” requesting permission to file additional briefs and for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steadman-v-crystal-gateway-marriott-ca4-2003.