Steadman v. Anderson
This text of 118 Misc. 2d 497 (Steadman v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.
It is uncontradicted that the City of Mount Vernon operated the premises in question from November, 1980 until October, 1981. During that period the premises were not a housing accommodation subject to rent control (Emergency Housing Rent Control Law, § 2, subd 2, par [e], L 1946, ch 274, § 2, as added L 1961, ch 337, as amd L 1966, ch 509). It follows that, since the premises were not rent controlled at the time the city abolished rent control on July 1, 1981, tenant was not entitled to the extension provided for in subdivision 2-a of section 12 of the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L 1971, ch 374, § 3).
Slifkin, J. P., Geiler and Di Paola, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 Misc. 2d 497, 463 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steadman-v-anderson-nyappterm-1983.