Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

629 So. 2d 649, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 438, 1993 WL 409979

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 476 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 15, 1993·No. 2910175·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Aabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of August 27, 1993, 629 So.2d 647 (Aa.1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., concurs. YATES, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Aabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of August 27, 1993, 629 So.2d 647 (Aa.1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., concurs. YATES, J., not sitting.

Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 629 So. 2d 649, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 438, 1993 WL 409979 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

629 So. 2d 649 (Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.