Steadfast Ins. Co. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Stinson)

Nevada Supreme Court

Steadfast Ins. Co. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Stinson)

DecidedOctober 22, 2021

Docket82938

StatusPublished

This text of Steadfast Ins. Co. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Stinson) (Steadfast Ins. Co. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Stinson)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steadfast Ins. Co. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Stinson), (Neb. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 82938 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE OCT 2 2 2021 JOANNA KISHNER, DISTRICT A. BROWN JUDGE, PREME COURT

Respondents, and JOHN STINSON, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DUNIESKY VELAZQUEZ- ESCOBEDO, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITÏON FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This emergency, original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the district court's refuSal to allOw petitioner to intervene in the underlying personal injury action. Petitioner has now filed a joint notice of settlement, signed by counsel for ail parties, indicating that the underlying district court case has been resolved in its entirety, which renders this writ petition moot, and seeking to withdraw the petition. The notice is treated a joint motion for voluntary dismissal. NRAP412(b). The motion is granted, and this writ proceeding is hereby dismissed. It is so ORDERED.

C.,. cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Selman Breitman, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPFIEME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1047A of.. 2

. . •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 82938 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE OCT 2 2 2021 JOANNA KISHNER, DISTRICT A. BROWN JUDGE, PREME COURT

Respondents, and JOHN STINSON, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DUNIESKY VELAZQUEZ- ESCOBEDO, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITÏON FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This emergency, original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the district court's refuSal to allOw petitioner to intervene in the underlying personal injury action. Petitioner has now filed a joint notice of settlement, signed by counsel for ail parties, indicating that the underlying district court case has been resolved in its entirety, which renders this writ petition moot, and seeking to withdraw the petition. The notice is treated a joint motion for voluntary dismissal. NRAP412(b). The motion is granted, and this writ proceeding is hereby dismissed. It is so ORDERED.

C.,. cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Selman Breitman, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPFIEME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1047A of.. 2

. . •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Steadfast Ins. Co. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Stinson), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steadfast-ins-co-vs-dist-ct-stinson-nev-2021.