STE. GENEVIEVE LAND INVESTORS, INC. v. Tucker

Missouri Court of Appeals

STE. GENEVIEVE LAND INVESTORS, INC. v. Tucker

170 S.W.3d 12, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2005 WL 831829

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 2005

DocketED 83622

StatusPublished

This text of 170 S.W.3d 12 (STE. GENEVIEVE LAND INVESTORS, INC. v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

STE. GENEVIEVE LAND INVESTORS, INC. v. Tucker, 170 S.W.3d 12, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2005 WL 831829 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Phillip H. Tucker, William T. Tucker, and Verna Tucker (collectively referred to herein as the “Tuckers”) appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of Ste. Genevieve Land Investors, Inc. (“SGLI”) on its petition for unlawful detainer. The Tuckers claim that the trial court erred in finding in favor of SGLI because they did not violate the terms of the lease. Additionally, the Tuckers argue that the trial court erred in finding that the lease was terminated because the forfeiture clause was against public policy. The Tuckers also claim that the trial court improperly awarded SGLI certain damages.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). The motion of SGLI for attorney’s fees on appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Phillip H. Tucker, William T. Tucker, and Verna Tucker (collectively referred to herein as the “Tuckers”) appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of Ste. Genevieve Land Investors, Inc. (“SGLI”) on its petition for unlawful detainer. The Tuckers claim that the trial court erred in finding in favor of SGLI because they did not violate the terms of the lease. Additionally, the Tuckers argue that the trial court erred in finding that the lease was terminated because the forfeiture clause was against public policy. The Tuckers also claim that the trial court improperly awarded SGLI certain damages.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). The motion of SGLI for attorney’s fees on appeal is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 S.W.3d 12, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, 2005 WL 831829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ste-genevieve-land-investors-inc-v-tucker-moctapp-2005.