Stayman v. Paxson
This text of 70 A. 803 (Stayman v. Paxson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs claimed ownership in fee of the land in question under the following codicil to the will of their grandfather : “ I hereby change the monied bequest of $20,000 dollars named in my will of Nov. 29th, 1881, and in Stead thereof, give those three children, two sons and one daughter, children of my deceased daughter A. E. Stayman, The Failor Farm at a valuation of $12,500 from which they will receive the income after the death of my wife their Grandmother, and at their death it will descend to their issue.”
The statement that they will receive the income after the death of their grandmother had reference to a charge on the land of its full rental value in her favor for life, and it may be doubted whether there was an intention to give less than an absolute estate. If the intention was to give a life estate only, the rule in Shelley’s case applies to the devise. The word “issue” in a will means,-prima facie, “heirs of the body,” and an estate tail was created into which the life estate merged, and which, by virtue of the act of 1855, was enlarged to a fee : Carroll v. Burns, 108 Pa. 386.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 A. 803, 221 Pa. 446, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stayman-v-paxson-pa-1908.