Stawicki v. Kelly
178 A. 754, 115 N.J.L. 190, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 288
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stawicki v. Kelly, 178 A. 754, 115 N.J.L. 190, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 288 (N.J. 1935).
178 A. 754 (Stawicki v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grant v. Touro Infirmary
223 So. 2d 148 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)
Martin v. PERTH AMBOY GENERAL HOSPITAL
250 A.2d 40 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Rothman v. Silber
216 A.2d 18 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Harlan v. Bryant
87 F.2d 170 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)