Stauffer v. Myles

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stauffer v. Myles

871 S.W.2d 16, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1878, 1993 WL 498781

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 1993·No. No. 62522·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcript and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcript and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Stauffer v. Myles, 871 S.W.2d 16, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1878, 1993 WL 498781 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

871 S.W.2d 16 (Stauffer v. Myles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.