Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 27, 2014·No. 13-1180·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

August 27, 2014

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2013-1180

RAYMOND E. STAUFFER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BROOKS BROTHERS GROUP, INC., formerly known as Retail Brand Alliance, Inc., formerly known as Brooks Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,

AND

UNITED STATES, Intervenor-Appellee.

Decided: July 10, 2014 Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes:

Page 13, in the second paragraph in Section IV, delete the phrase “, and that the case should be reassigned to a different judge on remand.”

Page 14, in a new paragraph after the last full paragraph in Section IV, add the sentence “Mr. Stauffer also argues that the case should be reassigned to a different judge on remand, but that issue is now moot.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers (Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.