Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers
This text of Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers (Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
August 27, 2014
ERRATA ______________________
Appeal No. 2013-1180
RAYMOND E. STAUFFER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BROOKS BROTHERS GROUP, INC., formerly known as Retail Brand Alliance, Inc., formerly known as Brooks Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,
AND
UNITED STATES, Intervenor-Appellee.
Decided: July 10, 2014 Precedential Opinion ______________________
Please make the following changes:
Page 13, in the second paragraph in Section IV, delete the phrase “, and that the case should be reassigned to a different judge on remand.” Page 14, in a new paragraph after the last full paragraph in Section IV, add the sentence “Mr. Stauffer also argues that the case should be reassigned to a different judge on remand, but that issue is now moot.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stauffer-v-brooks-brothers-cafc-2014.